Starship | SN10 | High-Altitude Flight Test

3 бер 2021
8 475 688 Переглядів

On Wednesday, March 3, Starship serial number (SN10) successfully completed SpaceX’s third high-altitude flight test of a Starship prototype from our site in Cameron County, Texas.
Similar to the high-altitude flight tests of Starship SN8 and SN9, SN10 was powered through ascent by three Raptor engines, each shutting down in sequence prior to the vehicle reaching apogee - approximately 10 km in altitude. SN10 performed a propellant transition to the internal header tanks, which hold landing propellant, before reorienting itself for reentry and a controlled aerodynamic descent.

The Starship prototype descended under active aerodynamic control, accomplished by independent movement of two forward and two aft flaps on the vehicle. All four flaps were actuated by an onboard flight computer to control Starship’s attitude during flight and enabled a precise landing at the intended location. SN10’s Raptor engines reignited as the vehicle performed the landing flip maneuver immediately before successfully touching down on the landing pad!
As if the flight test was not exciting enough, SN10 experienced a rapid unscheduled disassembly shortly after landing. These test flights are all about improving our understanding and development of a fully reusable transportation system designed to carry both crew and cargo on long-duration interplanetary flights, and help humanity return to the Moon, and travel to Mars and beyond.

КОМЕНТАРІ
  • To watch this...now I am fully realized....indeed we are living in the primitives' era technology of transportation..., I am not too obsessed with the USS Enterprise of Startrek TV's movie in 1970 ....but thought they were still more advanced than this one even though Starship USS Enterprise just fiction movies, but I would be pleased to ride with Mr. Spock rather than Mr. Elon Musk

    Admiral AntlantisAdmiral Antlantis21 хвилина тому
  • This is Old technology, how about show us the gravity propulsion engine that NASA has and works on it since 1947 Roswell?

    e.e.Годину тому
  • Love from Pakistan

    Mahad AliMahad Ali2 години тому
  • 11:44 that looks cinematic

    Kid Alaina BabyKid Alaina Baby15 годин тому
  • They'll be the first people on the Moon haha

    Elza LeshaElza Lesha22 години тому
  • DOGE/USDT 10x Dogecoin

    Mushroom HeadMushroom Head22 години тому
  • Keren

    mushtardinomushtardino22 години тому
  • ohhhhh come ooooooonnnn!!!! where is the explosion???? I was waiting for it!.

    Ivan SanchezIvan SanchezДень тому
  • Caca 💩

    Cristian VenturaCristian VenturaДень тому
  • Caca 💩

    Maxi BalboaMaxi BalboaДень тому
  • ._.XD

    Luis Mario García ÁlvaresLuis Mario García ÁlvaresДень тому
  • Lol. Looks like animation.

    Reiner ZufallReiner ZufallДень тому
  • it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corpo_eterico#:~:text=Il%20corpo%20eterico%2C%20o%20corpo,parte%20della%20sua%20anatomia%20occulta.

    Daniele Di LorenzoDaniele Di LorenzoДень тому
  • ukworld.info/main/v-deo/hJx224CapneciYE.html

    Daniele Di LorenzoDaniele Di LorenzoДень тому
  • Doesn't need a rocket scientist to figure out the cgi part

    tool boxtool boxДень тому
    • no, just a couple of idiots

      Lmao.Lmao.16 годин тому
    • There's no CGI here whatsoever.

      logitech4873logitech4873День тому
  • 10:15 this shot really encapsulates the speed at which it’s falling and then how much the belly flop slows it down

    Cursed BaljeetCursed Baljeet2 дні тому
  • Man SPACEX rocks 🎸 😎

    Josh LambertJosh Lambert2 дні тому
  • Congrats for that cameraman

    John WolvertonJohn Wolverton2 дні тому
  • one word:amazing

    MartianMartian2 дні тому
  • Goodluck

    Romli YasinRomli Yasin2 дні тому
  • Eu não canso de ver isso aqui decolar É muito lindo, é fascinante, é tudo...

    abcabc2 дні тому
  • NASA SELECT SPACE X FOR HLS

    Freedom & DemocracyFreedom & Democracy2 дні тому
  • And the made it even without naci-engineers!

    Alexandr MaroszAlexandr Marosz3 дні тому
  • Рогозин от злости рвëт батуты 😂 Респект Илону Маску 😇👍

    Охотник за головамиОхотник за головами3 дні тому
    • Я перевел это, ха-ха-ха, фантастика

      bautista mercaderbautista mercaderДень тому
  • Who has a feeling that Sn15 will be like Sn10 but won't explode 8 minutes later

    SFS JoltSFS Jolt3 дні тому
  • how many time i watched this video?

    spacex_sciencey_timezspacex_sciencey_timez3 дні тому
  • 5:25

    dueidjdueidj4 дні тому
  • Unbelievable

    David HammondDavid Hammond4 дні тому
  • Those rockets are a waste of time and money they're dangerous because you have to carry that fuel for landing which also makes it not economical it's a waste of time and money

    steveissexy 1967.steveissexy 1967.4 дні тому
    • "Why do we need those stupid cars, they are a waste of money, my horse works just fine!"

      Kellogg's FlakesKellogg's Flakes18 годин тому
    • Oh so you just want to watch humanity falter as we progress, no we need to build space rockets capable of mars missions for humans and beyond, if not humans will eventually meet 5hier fate stuck on the planet, I don't see why you say this with such stupidity

      SFS JoltSFS Jolt3 дні тому
    • lol

      TuuminshzTuuminshz4 дні тому
  • I love this

    Guillermo RivasGuillermo Rivas4 дні тому
  • Заебись мультфильм...

    Серж ВладимирскийСерж Владимирский5 днів тому
  • beautiful CGI

    Live TuberLive Tuber5 днів тому
    • There's no CGI here.

      logitech4873logitech4873День тому
  • spaceX

    Brien DunphyBrien Dunphy5 днів тому
  • wach sorry

    Brien DunphyBrien Dunphy5 днів тому
  • Flying Squid

    iql dnriql dnr5 днів тому
  • I think Elon musk did the the biggest bottle flip in juman history

    Alexander PerdomoAlexander Perdomo5 днів тому
    • Human history

      Alexander PerdomoAlexander Perdomo5 днів тому
  • ukworld.info/main/v-deo/rtuXlIbMzK55c2Q.html

    Buğra Çağrı YURTBuğra Çağrı YURT6 днів тому
  • announcer sounds like a dude from the early 1950's

    lifefunseeker todaylifefunseeker today6 днів тому
    • That's John Insprucker for you! He is an amazing person.

      TimeProTimePro2 години тому
  • " If it doesn't look like a duck, swim like a duck, and quack like a duck, then it probably isn't a duck "

    [[[] S c o t b o X []]][[[] S c o t b o X []]]6 днів тому
  • oyes desde el segundo 40 al 30 dice hay falla en el sistema

    Jimmy B. Perez LopezJimmy B. Perez Lopez6 днів тому
  • The dislikes are from aliens

    rbxlessrbxless6 днів тому
  • Focusnici blin

    Андрей КаАндрей Ка6 днів тому
  • Me: shows off my laggy big thicc redstone rocket in random Minecraft creative worlds What I see 5:43

    LeEpicPlayz BaconLeEpicPlayz Bacon7 днів тому
  • So finally that attack is rebugged for enslavement of attackers pilots and defense missiles to aoid future outfalls...

    Elias OhmElias Ohm7 днів тому
  • 1:11 sn9 moment 1:31 sn8 moment

    LoparceGaming826LoparceGaming8267 днів тому
  • gg

    PrimeIXPrimeIX8 днів тому
  • 👍👽

    Виталий ЛукашинВиталий Лукашин8 днів тому
  • It's so. incredibly. loud. WOw!

    emmmemmm8 днів тому
  • Amazing job!

    Heybar SequeraHeybar Sequera8 днів тому
  • Was that real footage or CGI interspersed with real footage?

    stringsnarestringsnare9 днів тому
    • Real footage, all the way through. It was a livestream.

      alexnalexn8 днів тому
  • 11:42 The best most unbelievable non CGI part of the video. Truly amazing shot

    HOW DO YOU VENT LIKE BLUE?HOW DO YOU VENT LIKE BLUE?10 днів тому
  • MUY BUENO- UN ABRAZO Y UN BESO GORDO- El video mio se encuentra en el YOU TUBE y se llama- robotizado con cd 4017 , ne 555 pilotos El plano esta bajo el video. Andre Troll Kaiser

    andre trollandre troll11 днів тому
  • Wow! I thankyou but i think the landing was far more astounding than the take off. Fantastic👍👍👍

    Frank TuckwellFrank Tuckwell11 днів тому
  • 11:41 Looks like one of those movie scenes.

    Glitched BloxGlitched Blox11 днів тому
  • Huge Respect for the Engineers, technicians and every worker at SpaceX 🙏💯.

    bcvbb hyuibcvbb hyui11 днів тому
  • Es una nave de Flash Gordon, OMG!

    moises gonzalesmoises gonzales11 днів тому
  • Cortaram a parte da explosão pq? HUAUHAUHHAUUH medo de cair ações elon musk?

    Caio PortellaCaio Portella11 днів тому
  • amazing..

    onemaxlightonemaxlight11 днів тому
  • For a moment, it looked CGI.

    ICOD73ICOD7312 днів тому
    • I watched this with my own eyes. 100% not CGI.

      Alex HendrixAlex Hendrix10 днів тому
    • Nice

      bcvbb hyuibcvbb hyui11 днів тому
  • The reduced vibration of this missile is an unparalleled precedent

    Ailsa NiAilsa Ni12 днів тому
  • Man will go mars no earlier than 2040. Even a small cybertruck takes years to be released to public, I can't imagine how long it will take starship to meet all the requirements. Probably decades. The news says we will see Man on mars very soon, just to keep us high expectations, but I think it's just marketing. I'm just being realistic.

    Igor Delta F.Igor Delta F.12 днів тому
    • I wrote the wrong number of days. It's +400 to 500 days. Yet not for this decade. It's just my opinion, I hope I'm wrong. Thank you Matt for remind me to correct the days. Mr. Lmao, sorry to challenge your beliefs, if you don't agree write why you don't, instead of going straight to offensive words.

      Igor Delta F.Igor Delta F.6 днів тому
    • @Lmao. My bad, I'll delete my response

      Matt's Youtube stuffMatt's Youtube stuff6 днів тому
    • @Matt's UKworld stuff i was referring to the original comment

      Lmao.Lmao.6 днів тому
    • so is this "argument" just some copy paste shit or are you part of a hivemind? i've seen this exact comment several times now.

      Lmao.Lmao.6 днів тому
    • @Igor Delta F. I'm not sure where you get 1400 days from. During the closest approach, Mars is about a 6-9 month journey depending on which year you launch. That is maximum ~270 days trip one way to Mars. Perhaps you can be more specific on where you are getting your numbers from

      Matt's Youtube stuffMatt's Youtube stuff7 днів тому
  • So Elon is iron man because that seems a lot like how iron man lands 😄👀

    little Phoenix33little Phoenix3312 днів тому
  • happen live 😂

    vbddfy euuytvbddfy euuyt13 днів тому
    • @Ailsa Ni what

      Cleanrial & Tronnzy - RobloxCleanrial & Tronnzy - Roblox11 днів тому
    • Демократия не долетит до Марса.

      Ailsa NiAilsa Ni12 днів тому
  • did anyone else notice the hard bounce on landing or the drone view that looked like a cheap netflix movie?

    Wayne DavisWayne Davis13 днів тому
  • hi mates is very enjoy...blazz_zzzz

    Olavo NevesOlavo Neves13 днів тому
  • congratulations

    SadSmileTVSadSmileTV13 днів тому
  • What a bunch a shit! Can't believe y'all into this crap, CGI at the end got me cracking, no craft can do that TODAY , c'mon guys wake the fuck up

    JP muroJP muro13 днів тому
    • Hundreds of people went and watched it. There's dozens of amateur videos on UKworld of the launch and landing. There's no CGI here whatsoever, get your eyes checked.

      logitech4873logitech4873День тому
    • @JP muro I have shown you multiple videos captured by amateurs, yet you still insist on cgi? What's your proof of CGI?

      alexnalexn8 днів тому
    • @JP muro twitter.com/RGVaerialphotos/status/1377001018102276097 (That was SN11 the twitter pic, the links are SN10) ukworld.info/main/v-deo/r52E2Z62kHiXeoU.html ukworld.info/main/v-deo/oZuhqY-auoGCf4k.html

      alexnalexn8 днів тому
    • @JP muro Well sure since that was filmed before the launch, lemme find you an amateur video of it. Theres also RGV Aerial Photography, and after the bellyflop Fail of SN11 they photgraphed it's nosecone laying on the ground im gonna get you some links.

      alexnalexn8 днів тому
    • The real question lies beyond you and me and what we both think. Theres proof , that this is all a hoax. The question is why are you defending something that you can't prove, while all claims against what your trying to cling to have tons of facts , scientific, to back them up. My proof is right there , the cgi sequence at the end and the so called landing, i know its hard. We both have our own truths and i respect that, its just that's this is soo in our faces , its impossible not to see. And question its nature

      JP muroJP muro8 днів тому
  • Modern warfare CGI looks way better , should give em a call #elonmusk

    JP muroJP muro13 днів тому
    • Go to boca chica

      Cleanrial & Tronnzy - RobloxCleanrial & Tronnzy - Roblox11 днів тому
    • looks like a sci fi film

      vbddfy euuytvbddfy euuyt13 днів тому
  • Alles nur lüge

    Björn der SachseBjörn der Sachse14 днів тому
    • Jede Person mit einem Donald Trump Profilbild hat still zu sein

      Volksgenosse Erich HoneckerVolksgenosse Erich Honecker13 днів тому
    • Go there yourself and see it for yourself

      alexnalexn13 днів тому
  • This style of aircraft- is it "Flash Gordon" style? Or more Rocketeer?

    Andy HarrisonAndy Harrison14 днів тому
  • nice cgi

    shark2vshark2v14 днів тому
    • Go to boca chica

      Cleanrial & Tronnzy - RobloxCleanrial & Tronnzy - Roblox11 днів тому
    • You can go there yourself and see it

      alexnalexn14 днів тому
  • Is this even real? It looks like cgi

    John McGrathJohn McGrath15 днів тому
    • yeah, its because it is

      Juan Pablo MuroJuan Pablo Muro8 днів тому
    • @alexn ye

      KELOO JBL ッKELOO JBL ッ13 днів тому
    • Go to Boca Chica, TX. You can see these getting built and flown in real time there.

      alexnalexn14 днів тому
  • Nice

    Lexi TalksLexi Talks15 днів тому
  • ไอ้ควายน็อตบอกแผนทุกอย่างองค์กรNASA มีแผนอยากเป็นเบอร์1ของสหรัฐ.แล้วจะกลับไปใช้สถานีอวกาศสกดจิตทุกพรรคในสหรัฐ. ให้สนับสนุนเงินงบประมาณและมีตัวแทนNASA ที่หวังลงชิงต่ำแหน่งประธานาธิบดีสหรัฐ.ในสมัยต่อไป

    แก่ง นางแก่ง นาง15 днів тому
  • NASA กลายเป็นควายเมื่อถูกจับได้ว่าใ้ดาวเทียม และใช้สถานทีอวกาศทดลองมนุษย์ แต่สู้ความคิดมนุษย์ไม่ได้ โดยล่าสุดมีการเปิดเผย ชื่อบอร์ดผู้สั่งให้มนุษย์อวกาศบนสถานีอวกาศทำงานนี้

    แก่ง นางแก่ง นาง15 днів тому
  • 12:00 I see starhopper

    Dave TimothyDave Timothy15 днів тому
    • ye love starhopper

      KELOO JBL ッKELOO JBL ッ13 днів тому
  • What I don’t like about the BFR is that there is no redundancy. Since fuel tanks are located in the nose cone, the crew cannot jettison from the top to escape an inevitable failure. Any manned flights must have redundancy.

    Saanichton MinistriesSaanichton Ministries15 днів тому
    • @Saanichton Ministries I agree ...,.. I don’t see nasa trusting SpaceX to place astronauts on Mars anytime soon until starship has at least 200-600 successful flights without incidence along with a smart AI to pilot starship However SpaceX does have falcon Heavy which is a proven space vehicle which I do see NASA trusting to send to the moon or Mars 🥲 Only the future will tell

      Eduardo Rodriguez VazquezEduardo Rodriguez Vazquez14 днів тому
    • @Eduardo Rodriguez Vazquez fair enough. After a study of the STS program, it would be a nightmare to fly on a rocket. As a pilot myself, it is fascinating science. But way too risky. I don’t ever see the risk factor going away. Man it too flawed. Too much can go wrong in manned space flight. Too many extremes. I don’t know if it is ethical watching people kill themselves trying to go to Mars.... like the Mars one project?

      Saanichton MinistriesSaanichton Ministries14 днів тому
    • @Saanichton Ministries Is this suppose be hyperbole ....? Obviously not, they only flow 4 of them🤦🏻and their still very much prototype rockets That’s the equivalence of me asking you if you’d like a flight on the wrights brothers first plane .....

      Eduardo Rodriguez VazquezEduardo Rodriguez Vazquez14 днів тому
    • @Eduardo Rodriguez Vazquez would you if you could?

      Saanichton MinistriesSaanichton Ministries14 днів тому
    • @Saanichton Ministries 🤨 ....... no I don’t

      Eduardo Rodriguez VazquezEduardo Rodriguez Vazquez14 днів тому
  • Демократия не долетит до Марса.

    Денис ПетинДенис Петин15 днів тому
  • bravo let's Mars but if Mars gravity is lower than Earth it's going to be easy landing

    Pascal FokxPascal Fokx16 днів тому
    • ouais

      KELOO JBL ッKELOO JBL ッ13 днів тому
  • FIREBALL XL5!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    NOMOLAS GYROTOURBILLONNOMOLAS GYROTOURBILLON16 днів тому
  • looks like a sci fi film

    vince mmvince mm16 днів тому
    • ye but is real

      KELOO JBL ッKELOO JBL ッ13 днів тому
  • That is bull shit.

    Carmen A. CabelloCarmen A. Cabello16 днів тому
    • @Shorty haha

      It’s grantIt’s grant13 днів тому
    • Carmen is close to karen

      ShortyShorty14 днів тому
    • @alexn thanks for saving me time

      It’s grantIt’s grant15 днів тому
    • Go and watch it yourself in boca chica before throwing bullshit accusations on UKworld

      alexnalexn15 днів тому
  • 24 7 live Mars cam coming soon : )

    Nebula DustNebula Dust16 днів тому
  • Congrats, the best sci fi movie ever... it's incredible...

    collilab laboratorio visivocollilab laboratorio visivo16 днів тому
  • Большая консервная банка с крыльями и двигателями..круто..поздравляю. Она еще и садиться..супер..

    Константин ГолубятниковКонстантин Голубятников16 днів тому
  • I like how they cut out where it exploded anyway. Scrub X blew it again. At least they are consistent.

    Jephro321Jephro32116 днів тому
    • They didn't cut anything out. The livestream ended shortly after landing. The explosion happened approx 7/8 minutes later

      Matt's Youtube stuffMatt's Youtube stuff7 днів тому
    • Did you even seen the live stream?

      K4!T3NK4!T3N11 днів тому
    • This is the testing stage it's normal for things to blow up.

      696911 днів тому
    • @Jephro321 Was saying no to you stating they cut it out. Yes it exploded, but they didnt "cut it out" they ended the stream before it exploded.

      alexnalexn15 днів тому
    • @alexn no what it blew up period.

      Jephro321Jephro32115 днів тому
  • launch pad is too close to the installations ! dangerous

    gilbondfacgilbondfac17 днів тому
  • When landing, the ignition is too late to correct. It needs to be 1-2 seconds earlier.The liquid fuel bunker should be divided into many small bunkers. Otherwise, if the whole bunker is turned vertically to horizontal, and then to vertical, the kinetic energy of the liquid itself can heat itself, causing expansion and deflagration

    KK FFKK FF17 днів тому
    • @TimePro oh nvm I commented on this before I check Elon’s Tweet again I kinda didn’t remember the case

      Epic gamer Heap1Epic gamer Heap110 днів тому
    • @Epic gamer Heap1 Starship DOES use helium. After SN8s crash helium was put into the header tank of SN9 and SN10 to keep the tank pressurized and to prevent what happened to SN8. The helium was not supposed to be ingested.

      TimeProTimePro10 днів тому
    • @TimePro An Starship does not have helium it only uses lox, methane fuel and pressure.

      Epic gamer Heap1Epic gamer Heap110 днів тому
    • @Epic gamer Heap1 That would be the case for SN8. SN10 has a hard landing because it ingested helium unexpectedly.

      TimeProTimePro12 днів тому
    • It is not late according to Elon the single raptor engine was low on thrust to due low pressure inside of one of the tanks

      Epic gamer Heap1Epic gamer Heap112 днів тому
  • Вероятно, данная труба должна изображать носитель? Труба еле-еле взобралась на высоту 2 км и опустилась на землю. Как она собирается разогнать полезный груз до необходимой скорости? Это просто лапша для неграмотных.

    Dolores IzabellaDolores Izabella17 днів тому
  • Need to add a parachute placed on top of the missile, when it falls straight. Need to improve the landing cooling system with the missile fixation axle after landing, I mean upgrading the yard system so that under it there is a shaft that can move and attach itself. as a landing gear. Maybe so, try using a flying parachute that cuts off when the Rocket is falling in mid-air. hm ... i think this idea can be sold, maybe n't 😄

    Huỳnh Đức LêHuỳnh Đức Lê17 днів тому
    • @Huỳnh Đức Lê Please for the love of god stop calling it a missile!

      It’s grantIt’s grant15 днів тому
    • @Huỳnh Đức Lê Yes, but they've already demonstrated they can land it without, and a parachute would also increase turnaround time for reuse. No need for one if propulsive landing can already yield the requested results.

      alexnalexn15 днів тому
    • @alexn I know it's heavy, I mean the parachute is only used for a short time and then cut off when the missile is horizontal, except that the missile is placed at the top of the missile retained at the upright position. The parachute flew horizontally should be two moderate instead of one large enough to bear the load since it would be cut off to enter the final stage anyway. Although mainly used to reduce the force and help more stability, the possibility of wind, the weather will adversely affect the parachute and affect the missile but this problem can be improved. which is that you can use three parachutes to change your posture from horizontal to straight if you cut the parachute from the tail of the Rocket.

      Huỳnh Đức LêHuỳnh Đức Lê15 днів тому
    • Starship is too heavy for a parachute.

      alexnalexn15 днів тому
  • what do you make of this: Take a look at the spaceX logo. (the actual logo). When I look at the logo SpaceX... I'm seeing: Spy.... then it says..... Cc .....(which in numerology is 33. Freemasons number). .... Then what looks like a symbol that appear to be something trying to 'break out of the dome". So that's one interpretation. Or another: Spa cex. Or in other words "Spa Sex". then the X in that looks like it could represent the act of sex (look carefully, it's crazy.) (boom-chic-a-waa-waa). Okay and a 3rd interpretation goes like this: SpaceX. Well "X" in english and internationally is a way of saying "No". So it's Space-NO. or in reverse: No Space. Which is pretty obvious these days. So those are 3 interpretations of the SpaceX LOGO.

    nice guynice guy17 днів тому
    • @nice guy I have no patience for people with special needs

      It’s grantIt’s grant10 днів тому
    • @69 no joke. All major corporate logos have something encoded.

      nice guynice guy10 днів тому
    • @It’s grant no joke. All major corporate logos have something encoded.

      nice guynice guy10 днів тому
    • @K4!T3N The rockets are a scam. The cars are turning out to be a scam. Everyone who's used PayPal for any length of time knows it's a complete scam. What has he turned out yet that's actually a quality product that's not a lie or a scam??? The car is one thing, because it's just a really really shitty car. But the rockets are total frauds. It's not space exploration. It's a fireworks company. People are so dumb they don't understand anything.

      nice guynice guy10 днів тому
    • You milking it??.... bruuuuuuhhhh

      K4!T3NK4!T3N11 днів тому
  • I think that the engineers made a mistake in constructing the "SN" rocket in that they practically limited the cooling of the "Raptor" engine. When the descent starts and the engines start, they start or do not work. Then air pressure is created which returns the heat to the "pot", so to speak. With Falcon rockets, the engines are free and they don't have that problem. One of the solutions is to drill holes in the lower part, next to the legs, or to line the engines with refractory material.

    Biljana Milinčić-BežanovićBiljana Milinčić-Bežanović17 днів тому
  • Did anybody see the paper clip to the right of screen

    Pete West Hordes CoffeePete West Hordes Coffee18 днів тому
    • ?????????? please show when?????????? U OK DUDE????????????

      It’s grantIt’s grant15 днів тому
  • Well done folks . Keep it up .

    Die KatzeDie Katze18 днів тому
  • cgi did not improve much i guess..

    derms terderms ter18 днів тому
    • @derms ter There's no CGI here whatsoever. Check all the amateur footage of the launch and landing filmed from Boca Chica beach and South Padre. Anyone can go watch these launches. Oh and I recommend you read up on the Dunning Kruger effect, because you're a prime example.

      logitech4873logitech4873День тому
    • @K4!T3N you speak like you came from there lol

      derms terderms ter11 днів тому
    • @derms ter Go to boca chica, texas.... you're just lazy... lol

      K4!T3NK4!T3N11 днів тому
    • @derms ter Theirs no need...... theirs hundreds of videos of the landing .......

      Eduardo Rodriguez VazquezEduardo Rodriguez Vazquez14 днів тому
    • @Eduardo Rodriguez Vazquez you film the landing for me, i will believe

      derms terderms ter14 днів тому
  • team.

    bouytt guytbouytt guyt18 днів тому
  • Оооо ес 🤑

    FinZdravFinZdrav18 днів тому
  • Cool

    nothing is impossiblenothing is impossible18 днів тому
    • ukworld.info/main/v-deo/jryutouY2HuEpH0.html

      Aistis AukstikalnisAistis Aukstikalnis17 днів тому
  • The mature pan practically observe because custard adventitiously refuse apud a unadvised captain. handy, dull black

    Ca SneaksCa Sneaks18 днів тому
  • Eh 3 years left before the starship goes to Mars

    Jared Johanne AgustinJared Johanne Agustin18 днів тому
    • Comento : viendo lo bien me llama la atención la toma de este lanzamiento que alguien por favor me explique como se realizo esta toma que tipo de cámara se uso no se s

      bouytt guytbouytt guyt18 днів тому
UKworld